I have to warn that this has got nothing to do with Einstein's theory of relativity or does it!!! This is a more generic and nothing to do with physics kind of theory. The most difficult part of any theory is the definition, once the definition is ready everything else is relatively simple. so let us make an attempt towards defining MaTOR (Mkan's Theory Of Relativity).
MaTOR states that the perceived outcome of any incident is inversely proportional to the relativity with the subject. There you are, albeit a bit crude and rough on the edges that is the definition.
PO Inversely Proportional to R(S) [I tried to get inversely proportional symbol in there, but couldn't ]
Where PO = Perceived Outcome
R = Relativity
S = Subject
Now, allow me to demonstrate the theory with an example.
Subject : Car
Dude A to Dude B: Dude guess what I was ripping the roads at an awesome speed of 180 Kmph.
PO1(No Relativity to Subject)
Dude B: Cool Dude!! That's just wickedly awesome.
Now let us add relativity factor and observe how Perceived Outcome PO is inverted.
Dude A: Oh btw, that was your car!!
PO2 (Relativity to Subject)
Dude B: WTF!!! you touch my car again, I will break your hands and legs.
Hence Proved.
There you go, the examples can go on, but I guess I made my point.
PO Inversely Proportional to R(S) [I tried to get inversely proportional symbol in there, but couldn't ]
Where PO = Perceived Outcome
R = Relativity
S = Subject
Now, allow me to demonstrate the theory with an example.
Subject : Car
Dude A to Dude B: Dude guess what I was ripping the roads at an awesome speed of 180 Kmph.
PO1(No Relativity to Subject)
Dude B: Cool Dude!! That's just wickedly awesome.
Now let us add relativity factor and observe how Perceived Outcome PO is inverted.
Dude A: Oh btw, that was your car!!
PO2 (Relativity to Subject)
Dude B: WTF!!! you touch my car again, I will break your hands and legs.
Hence Proved.
There you go, the examples can go on, but I guess I made my point.
No comments:
Post a Comment